The public has been left in shock following revelations about a scandal involving the Saint Habakkuk Monastery, with more serious allegations yet to surface, potentially causing an even greater impact.
It has been reported that in the coming days, it will become apparent whether several complainants will take the bold step of filing a criminal complaint, which could include some of the most serious charges under the law.
There are also other complaints, including one for forgery and others for conspiracy, which are already under review.
An intense media battle is currently taking place between two warring sides; defrocked and accused monks, and the Bishop of Tamassos and Orini, Isaias, which has resulted in a deluge of information being released into the public domain.
Lawyers, witnesses and other parties have been called upon to intervene, creating a remarkable impression of a trial taking place in real-time.
The goal for each side is to influence public opinion in their favour, with various videos, descriptions and accounts being shared, often leading to rebuttals, denials and counterclaims.
In some instances, these actions appear to be more about making a show of force than having any real impact on the investigations.
Despite the confusion that has arisen, particularly in the early stages of this controversy, the public is beginning to form a clearer picture of the events that have unfolded.
One version of events claims the conflict arose from the Bishop’s detection of irregular activity within the monastery and his subsequent demands for explanations. However, another narrative suggests the root cause was the Metropolitan’s requests for large sums of money from the monastery, which were denied.
The monks’ legal team is attempting to present their clients as the aggrieved party, in an effort to gain public sympathy, while also trying to convey the impression that they hold the upper hand in this dispute. This strategy appears to be aimed at creating divisions within the Metropolitan’s camp, which has accused the monks of various wrongdoings.
As part of this approach, the monks’ lawyers have sent a letter to the Holy Synod requesting the immediate suspension of Isaias, a move which would place him in the same predicament as their clients. The letter also hints at a forthcoming criminal case against the Bishop, which could be filed within days.
The same legal team has sought to dismiss a news report which claimed that Father Nectarios placed his hand on a Gospel and assured the Bishop that accusations of financial impropriety were baseless.
The lawyers have issued a statement categorically denying the incident ever occurred, nor did Father Nectarios swear to it.
Despite this, the accusations levelled by the Father regarding financial demands remain and are reportedly supported by evidence including the testimonies of monks and SMS messages.
The truth behind these conflicting accounts is expected to emerge in the coming days.
A further incident involving a monk physically assaulting a woman has also captured public attention.
Despite video evidence of the assault, the female victim has since claimed that the footage was misleading and that the altercation was the result of her error. She went on to defend the monk and claimed that their relationship remained unaffected by the incident.
Another allegation levelled at a monk involves the application of myrrh to a cross, which was said to have been instructed by Father Nectarios.
The Bishop had previously complained that this act, which was captured on video, resembled a miracle because the myrrh ran down the cross when worshippedpers kissed it.
The lawyers have attempted to discredit this by providing a written testimony from a Greek pilgrim, who claims the cross was cleaned with antiseptic liquid and ethyl alcohol.
Read more:
